Memories of my Past

Thursday 17 October 2013

Speech from the Toilet Se . . . er Throne


There is nothing like a wonderful streak of beautiful fall weather to mess up your plans to write regular blog entries.  And that is exactly what we have had for several weeks now.  Who wants to be stuck at a computer indoors when you can be out and about doing other things like moving your outdoor furniture indoors because you know that this cannot last? As my grandmother used to say when the weather was good, dour old Scot that she was, “We’ll pay for this.”  And so, it appears, that day is approaching.  So now it is time to get serious once again and write something meaningful (I hope).
So how about a few words on the Throne Speech presented to you by our friendly government this week.  I think the most positive thing said about it was that the Governor General read it very nicely.  As for the rest, here are a few thoughts on what was, or was not, presented.

Did you notice there was nothing said about foreign policy or defence spending?
You know, I used to think the conservatives believed in the free market for their economic platform, but this no longer seems to be the case.  Witness the following.

The speech said that they were going to bring prices into line with US prices for goods and services.  I’m no economist, but I only know of two ways to accomplish this.  The first is to fix prices based on US prices.  This will, of course, skew the market significantly, but maybe not before they get themselves through the next election.  The second is to peg the dollar against the US dollar, which if events in the US get any worse, could be like handcuffing yourself to the railing of a sinking ship.  Both of these measures have been tried in the past, although admittedly when price controls were brought in during the 1970s they also included wage controls.  In both cases, the end results weren’t pretty.  And besides, they break every rule of a free market economy.
The speech also talked about forcing telecom companies to reduce roaming charges, presumably because Bay Street executives don’t like them when they go to their Muskoka cottages in the summer.  This, of course, is a weak response for people who think we pay too much for cell phone service. These responses have included attempts to lure other companies into the fray, so far with poor results.  I have tried one of the “new kids on the block”.  The service was spotty at best.  The reception was such that the phone was constantly seeking alternate sources which kept resulting in roaming charges right around our own home.  But when they started charging an extra two dollars when you paid your bill at one of their outlets, we had enough and left them. 

People think our costs for cell phone and wireless service should be the same as the US.  But Canada is not the same as the US market.  The biggest difference is in population density.  We have more land area and only ten percent of the US population.  If you examine the big US carriers, you will find that they do not, in general, serve low density areas of their country.  It probably cost about the same in infrastructure costs to serve a high density area like New York or Los Angeles, as a low density area like eastern Ontario.  But those similar costs are paid for by tens of millions of people in those areas of the US compared to less than a couple of million people in eastern Ontario.  And when you also have to serve places like the Maritime Provinces and the prairies, of course the costs in Canada are going to be higher.  We have competition in Canada among three players which is perhaps the most that can adequately serve the broad reaches and low density of the Canadian market.  Any other way of forcing lower costs is just interference in the (conservative ideal) free market.
And to top it all off, the government promises us a law requiring balanced budgets.  But it will have loopholes for years that are not good economically . . . bad years being defined by the government of course.  And by the way, what happened to the balanced, even surplus, budgets that we had by the government before the Tories?

My impression of this throne speech is that it is a trap for the party that will replace the Conservatives in 2015.  Because the skewed markets promised by this plan will have to be fixed, with some pain, at a later date.
So there are my thoughts from the throne.